← back

m625 is not a clinical decision tool · not a publisher · not an expert authority · not a simulator. It is a cross-domain Roll-formalized evidence atlas with public audit + attack surface.
persona: clinician · domain: neuro · tier: 1
ferry target: m590 · fixture id: DEMO-014
self-audit grade: A

i_demo_014 · clinician × neuro · chronic-pain Roll-formalized clinical-reading layer

Why a clinician in chronic-pain practice would come to evidence.x1000.ai

Pain medicine clinicians (anesthesiology pain · physiatry · neurology · psychiatry overlap) work with cross-modality intervention sets (medication · neurostimulation · behavioral · acupuncture-neuroscience adjuncts) and need a Roll-formalized way to talk about population-level evidence patterns that does not slide into individual prediction. Pain points:

m625 does not advise on pain-medicine practice. **m625 shows what the m517 CARD01 Tu 2020 attractor pattern looks like as a clinical-reading layer**, and what cross-modality V invariance (CARD06 VGAIT pattern) means for a clinician choosing between intervention modalities at the *framework* level (not at the individual-patient level).

This is not a clinical decision directive tool. This is not an individual-patient prognosis.


The Roll-formalized object (anchored on m517 CARD01 + CARD06)

FieldValue
Primary upstreamm517 02_cards_cooked/CARD01_DEEP_v0.2.md (Tu 2020 · TMU-A · K4.1 = (1, 1, 0))
Cross-modality companionm517 02_cards_cooked/CARD06_DEEP_v0.2.md (VGAIT cross-Δ same V · TMU-A)
Domainchronic pain (post-injury · fibromyalgia · post-surgical · mind-body comorbidity)
K4.1 attractor declarationK4.1 = (1, 1, 0) — population-level brain network state altered, dynamics altered, intervention boundary not yet declared altered in CARD01 frame
Cross-modality invarianceV invariant across Δ-B (medication · neurostim · behavioral) per CARD06 framework — necessary, not sufficient
m517 readinessv0.3.0 Wave 2 closed (BIRTH snapshot 2026-05-21T19:55Z · m556 registered)

How a clinician should read this evidence (≤ 5 minutes)


Cross-domain transferability declaration (per W6.3)

The K4.1 = (1, 1, 0) TMU-A attractor pattern shares bit-pattern with m610 i_case_cancer_150 (BRCA1/2 PARP-i synthetic-lethality) — bit-pattern coincidence, not substantive equivalence. transferability_pct: structural-analog only at the Roll-form level. Substantive transferability requires m620 verification at a cross-domain exec dir; m625 v1.0 does not assert one.


What this demo will not say (anti-drift)


Falsifying prediction

Falsified by either of:


Attack surface entries


Ferry target

m590 (primary · claim_pack) · m624 (secondary · customer_pack for clinician slate, CME context).


Honest verdict (W6.5)

- *"How is this useful for actual care?"* — Not directly. It is a clinical-reading layer for the evidence framework, not a care directive. - *"VGAIT is a single trial."* — Correct; CARD06 anchor is single-trial; cross-modality V invariance generalization is an open conjecture, not a confirmed result.